Skip to main content

One Day: Holocaust Memorial Day 2022


27 Jan 2022

Today is Holocaust Memorial Day – marking the 77th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest Nazi concentration camp.

The theme for this year is ‘One Day’, which can be interpreted in a number of different, but each important, ways.

The 27th January is One Day when we come together to remember and to remind ourselves about the horrors wrought by the Holocaust and the genocides that have followed since in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur – in the hope that One Day there may be a future with no genocide.

We can also pick One Day to learn about the events that took place on that day and how they shaped history. We could pick the 19th April 1943 – the day the Jewish inhabitants of the Warsaw Ghetto fought back against their Nazi oppressors – or the 17th April 1975 – the day the Khmer Rouge entered the Cambodian capital and began five years of terror.

For survivors of the Holocaust and of genocide, One Day often means the point at which everything changed for them – the day they were separated from loved ones, the day they left their country in the hope of a better life elsewhere, or even the day they were liberated or found sanctuary.  

Taking One Day at a time has been the reality for so many who have fought to survive the ravages of war. The singular hope that just getting through each day meant there was a chance the next could be better.

There is hope that One Day in the future there will be no genocide, and that is why it remains so important that we look back and learn from what has happened in the past.

The scale and systematic brutality of the Holocaust – killing 6 million Jewish men, women and children – threatened our basic understanding of human rights and of democracy, and that is why genocide must still be resisted and opposed today.

The ongoing threat of anti-semitism is sadly still with us, and recent events in Texas, with four people taken hostage in the Congregation Beth Israel synagogue in Colleyville, serve as yet another reminder.

Last week the UN adopted a resolution aimed at tackling Holocaust denial, expressing concern about its growing prevalence through global information channels.  They urge member states to “reject without any reservation any denial or distortion of the Holocaust as a historical event, either in full or in part, or any activities to this end”

The resolution also commends countries that have preserved the concentration and death camp sites we are all now familiar with, encourages the development of programmes that can educate today’s and future generations, and urges social media companies to take active measures to combat antisemitism and Holocaust denial or distortion.

Having the will and resolve to do this is so important, and particularly for young people who rely on the testimony of others, many of whom who are no longer with us.

The work of the Holocaust Educational Trust remains key in building greater awareness and understanding and led the initiative to include the Holocaust within the English National Curriculum, where it has remained since its introduction in 1991.

School children in East Hampshire and nationwide have learnt a great deal from reflecting on the many lessons of the Holocaust. Some have been able to hear from survivors, some have even had the unique experience of reflecting at Auschwitz itself.

After the unimaginable horror of the Holocaust the world said ‘never again’, but the genocides that have followed have proved the lasting threat of our potential inhumanity to others.

In remembering the Holocaust, the world now strives for a time when that ‘never again’ can One Day be said with confidence."


This article first appeared in the Herald Group newspapers and Petersfield Post in January 2022. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gains...

Closing the digital divide: a legacy for lockdown

26 Mar 2021 There is a spark of potential in everyone. At the heart of education is the commitment to help all pupils, whatever their background, realise that potential.    Many things contribute to social mobility: the home environment, early development, character and well-being, careers advice, role models, networks. But it is through education that the biggest differences can be made – and within education, it is all about teachers. That person standing at the front of the room can unlock the chances, and change the life course, of the child.   A central question in social mobility is how best to support great teachers. An increasingly important part of that is how best to deploy technology.  During the recent lockdowns, we have come to rely on education technology, or ‘EdTech’, like never before. Learning at a distance – and having to make that change so quickly – has been very challenging for teachers and for parents, as well as for children. But it has also hi...

On post-truth and fake news

25 Jan 2017  'Post-truth’ is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016.  (Other recent winners of the annual accolade have included ‘vape’, ‘selfie’ and the ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji, apparently). Elsewhere we have heard ‘fake news’ decried, and a debate about whether you can have ‘facts’ and ‘alternative facts’ or if there can only ever be facts and falsehoods. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth is “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.  It is a concept that is said to have been building in salience around the world. It seems many had felt a long-standing mismatch between what the ‘elites’ in politics or business or the media had been saying was good for them, and what they felt themselves.  So the concept of the ‘objective fact’ had not been totally clear. There has always been partial news, and because of what psychologists call...