Skip to main content

The incalculable value of our Constitutional Monarchy

As both Houses of Parliament gathered in Westminster Hall for the Presentation of Addresses to the new King, it was a poignant reminder of the unique role of our Monarchy.

A solemn but striking occasion, with the full splendour of the State Trumpeters of the Household Cavalry, the King’s Body Guard of the Yeoman of the Guard, and the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen at Arms, it followed the Proclamation of the Accession made the day before.

The message of King Charles’s accession has been proclaimed across the country, read aloud by High Sheriffs, Lord Lieutenants, Deputy Lieutenants and Mayors.  From St James’s Palace the message cascaded to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, to the cities and counties, and onwards.  In an age of instant electronic communication, the delivery of the Proclamation by word of mouth serves to remind us not only of the momentousness of the occasion, but that it is a personal message to each one of us.

The great political thinker Walter Bagehot described the constitution as being divided into two branches: the ‘dignified’ (the Monarchy) and the ‘efficient’ (Parliament, ministers and civil servants).  Now, you can always argue about the efficiency of government, but the dignity of our monarchy has once again been marvelled upon by the whole world. 

Of course we are not ‘ruled’ by our Sovereign.  But equally it would be a mistake to suppose that the role of the Monarchy is purely ceremonial or symbolic.

We are at once both a long-established and well-developed liberal democracy and a monarchy.  Our constitutional Monarchy is a precious thing.  It sets us apart from other nations, and I believe firmly that it has been and continues to be a great advantage for us.

It is something that we don’t really think about much.  Indeed we haven’t had to think about it much, because it has operated effectively – you might say, out of Bagehot’s earshot, efficiently – for so long.

But, as with all precious things, you have to know the value of what you have, and defend and protect it.

With the passing of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth and the accession of His Majesty King Charles, I hope over the coming months, we all can reflect on the value, not only of Her service and His, but on the monarchy itself.  In different ways, it would make a great topic of discussion at every level from our local primary schools, to book clubs, to adult education colleges, the WEA and U3A.

In our country, we have proved that a monarchy need not be in tension with modern democracy but a bolster to it and a firm underpinning.  The way the two ‘branches’ are intertwined gives a certainty and continuity to the political and administrative part.

The most prominent outward expressions of the principle are events like the King’s Speech to open a parliamentary session.  As the Herald and Post go to press this week, MPs will be reaffirming allegiance to the new Sovereign.  Ministers are Ministers of the Crown.  The Privy Council is His Majesty’s Privy Council.  No Bill becomes an Act of Parliament until it has been given Royal Assent.  And yet there is never any question about the primacy of the People, through their representative democracy.  Indeed, the formalities that accompany the appointment of a new government or new Prime Minister, and the passing of laws, in a somewhat indefinable way make this all the more certain.

Although without direct political power, the Monarch remains the apex of the constitution which, being unwritten, relies on convention, goodwill and personal responsibility.   Being unwritten, but widely understood, also makes our constitution better able to evolve, as in a changing world it of course must. 

The position of the monarch, and the respect with which the institution and individual are regarded, has often helped to maintain stability, closely entwined with long standing norms and historic traditions.  Overseeing the transfer of power between governments is just one example.  

We’ve heard time and again over the last week about the quiet and valued counsel afforded by The Queen during the weekly audiences with her Prime Ministers. A time when issues could be discussed in privacy, with a monarch who had a unique perspective on events through time and right around the world.

The long reign of Queen Elizabeth very much defined the modern constitutional monarchy as we see it today. 

The transition from Empire to Commonwealth was a major achievement. The Queen helped build a global community that has a common purpose which has been, and remains, immensely important. 

Bringing together 2.5 billion people, the Commonwealth fosters shared values through sport, education, and cultural exchange, and helps promote development and democracy.  As a country we have an important role to play in the Commonwealth, but it belongs of course to all its member nations equally, and I am sure it can play an even wider positive role in future.

Also important is the soft power and diplomacy of state visits, overseas tours and audiences with world leaders, helping to encourage trade, understanding and good relations with other nations.  Nobody can host a state visit quite as Britain can.

Her late Majesty’s role in encouraging reconciliation in Northern Ireland and strengthening ties with the Republic of Ireland, our nearest neighbour, was great indeed. 

She was Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Through her Christmas and Easter messages, she helped make the lessons of faith relatable and understandable to millions – whatever their faith, and indeed those of none.

As Head of State the monarch remains above politics, someone who unites rather than divides. 

This unique position brings patronage to many great causes, helping to support and publicise the work of charities, foundations and community groups.  This is a function of course maintained not only by the Sovereign but by others in the Royal Family.  Institutions like the Prince’s Trust have done enormous amounts of practical good works.  

The Queen’s reign has been most appreciated for its commitment to public service, the ideals of which many politicians aspire to and are in turn measured by.  

Decency, trustworthiness and honesty, selflessness and duty are all key tenets of service in public life, and in celebrating The Queen’s life it has reminded us all of their importance.

The Queen stepped forward at times both difficult and joyous for our country, but above all she remained true to the values of our constitutional monarchy.

We were fortunate to have had such a remarkable custodian of it for so long. Her funeral on Monday was a fitting tribute that moved countless millions across the world.  I am sure that you, like me, will never forget it, and certainly we will never forget her."


This article first appeared in the Herald Group newspapers and Petersfield Post in September 2022

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gains...

On post-truth and fake news

25 Jan 2017  'Post-truth’ is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016.  (Other recent winners of the annual accolade have included ‘vape’, ‘selfie’ and the ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji, apparently). Elsewhere we have heard ‘fake news’ decried, and a debate about whether you can have ‘facts’ and ‘alternative facts’ or if there can only ever be facts and falsehoods. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth is “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.  It is a concept that is said to have been building in salience around the world. It seems many had felt a long-standing mismatch between what the ‘elites’ in politics or business or the media had been saying was good for them, and what they felt themselves.  So the concept of the ‘objective fact’ had not been totally clear. There has always been partial news, and because of what psychologists call...

To narrow the gap, the earlier you start the better

8 Oct 2013 In his Conference speech last week, Michael Gove set out clearly the moral purpose of policy: not only to raise standards for all, but just as important, to narrow the yawning achievement gap between rich and poor.  He described the Conservative mission to ensure “that every child has the opportunity to flourish”.  Though progress has already been made, in 2012 there was a 26 percentage points gap at GCSE (5+C+ including English & Maths) between kids on free school meals and their more affluent peers. But addressing this gap with teenagers is way too late.  The performance gap appears very early and widens through the school years.  In  Seven Key Truths about Social Mobility , the all-party social mobility group identified that the point of greatest leverage to equalise opportunity is the very earliest years. Of course kids from all backgrounds go on to do brilliant things.  But overall and on average, the correlations have a smooth predictab...