Skip to main content

The green industrial revolution


27 Nov 2020

Green industrial revolution” is a term that we have heard used a great deal in recent years.  The Ten Point Plan set out last week now puts that revolution in motion.

I know how many local groups and residents here in East Hampshire are passionate about the environment, and this plan marks the start of the UK’s path to net zero by 2050 and provides an important blueprint ahead of the COP26 climate summit that is due to be held in Glasgow next year.

It also comes as the UK prepares to co-host the Climate Ambition summit on the 12th December, marking the fifth anniversary of the Paris Agreement.

Covering clean energy, transport, nature and innovative technologies, it is big in scale and ambition, with an aim to create and support up to 250,000 highly-skilled green jobs.

It surprises many to hear that the UK is already further advanced compared to other countries on a number of aspects of green energy – an in particular offshore wind deployment.  Now there will be a target to produce enough offshore wind to power every home, quadrupling how much we produce to 40GW by 2030. 

Transport is also a key pillar of the plan, accelerating the transition to electric vehicles, and transforming our national infrastructure to better support their use.  News this week that the UK will end the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans by 2030, ten years earlier than originally planned, is not popular with everyone, I know, but is key to this shift.

The cost of electric cars needs to keep coming down, but equally important is infrastructure.  In areas like East Hampshire, with a lot of off-street parking, home charging is central.  But people also need confidence they will always be able to re-charge.  The £1.3 billion to support the rollout of chargepoints is therefore important.

But transport isn’t all about electric.  Hydrogen is at a much earlier stage of development, but could be the eventual answer, especially for goods vehicles.  As I’ve argued in Parliament, we need to invest in this technology too, and so I was pleased to see the plan to generate 5GW of production capacity by 2030.

Especially in the Covid lockdown, cycling and walking have come to the fore – and they are of course the most carbon-friendly transport modes of all.  The recent announcement of a further £175m being made available to Local Authorities in England for cycling and walking infrastructure will include more than £3m for Hampshire.  And the District Council has done a lot of work mapping out where future priorities will be.

An arena in which our local area will play a key part is trees.  Trees tick a lot of boxes – including the visual landscape, biodiversity, flood prevention – and also to reduce carbon.  There are ambitious plans locally - and nationally it is now envisaged we will plant 30,000 hectares of trees every year.

Elsewhere in the Ten Point Plan are items on nuclear energy, carbon capture and battery storage.  Batterie technology, in particular, I have always believed will be the big game changer – for transport, but also for generation: in theory, once the batteries are good enough, you could have close to all your electricity need provided by renewables.

This Ten Point Plan is indeed bold and gives a clear signal to industries across the British economy to invest here in the UK, and develop the skills, technology and infrastructure that will enable us to look forward to a greener future.   But it certainly won’t be the last word.  Just as the Industrial Revolution continued to develop, so too must we continue to evolve our green industrial revolution.


This article first appeared in the Herald Group newspapers and Petersfield Post in November 2020

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gains...
Post a Comment
Read more

On post-truth and fake news

25 Jan 2017  'Post-truth’ is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016.  (Other recent winners of the annual accolade have included ‘vape’, ‘selfie’ and the ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji, apparently). Elsewhere we have heard ‘fake news’ decried, and a debate about whether you can have ‘facts’ and ‘alternative facts’ or if there can only ever be facts and falsehoods. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth is “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.  It is a concept that is said to have been building in salience around the world. It seems many had felt a long-standing mismatch between what the ‘elites’ in politics or business or the media had been saying was good for them, and what they felt themselves.  So the concept of the ‘objective fact’ had not been totally clear. There has always been partial news, and because of what psychologists call...
Post a Comment
Read more

To narrow the gap, the earlier you start the better

8 Oct 2013 In his Conference speech last week, Michael Gove set out clearly the moral purpose of policy: not only to raise standards for all, but just as important, to narrow the yawning achievement gap between rich and poor.  He described the Conservative mission to ensure “that every child has the opportunity to flourish”.  Though progress has already been made, in 2012 there was a 26 percentage points gap at GCSE (5+C+ including English & Maths) between kids on free school meals and their more affluent peers. But addressing this gap with teenagers is way too late.  The performance gap appears very early and widens through the school years.  In  Seven Key Truths about Social Mobility , the all-party social mobility group identified that the point of greatest leverage to equalise opportunity is the very earliest years. Of course kids from all backgrounds go on to do brilliant things.  But overall and on average, the correlations have a smooth predictab...
Post a Comment
Read more