Skip to main content

Why we need political parties


28 Sep 2016

Party conference season is upon us again. The annual jamborees attract thousands of delegates and activists to hear the keynote speeches, and take part in the hundreds of fringe events away from the main arena.

Each party is at an important stage right now and what happens at conference this year could have a significance well beyond the convention centre.

The Lib Dems are re-building. The Greens are looking for a breakthrough. UKIP have to figure out what role they have in a post-referendum world.

Perhaps most notable this year is Labour, whose Liverpool conference is closing just as the Post hits the news-stands today. They will have heard from a Leader with a refreshed mandate – one who appeals strongly to his party's membership, but less so to his parliamentary team.

Next week I will be with my Conservative colleagues in Birmingham. The focus will be on the new era we now have under a new PM, and the challenges and opportunities ahead as we manage the UK’s exit from the European Union.

Parties can be something of a paradox. Far from being groups of people who always agree with each other, they can accommodate a wide range of views, and debate on the party conference fringe can be lively indeed.

But what unites a party must be much stronger than what divides it. There will be shared core values and purpose, which enable a party to present a coherent programme to the electorate, accepting the inevitable trade-offs and compromises.

No policy programme could perfectly reflect every preference of any one individual in the party, or indeed the electorate.  But it must appeal sufficiently for a majority of people to get behind it. Then you can have a functioning and stable government.

Our parliamentary system also needs balance.  A strong and effective government needs a good opposition.  Despite the term, it can’t just be about opposing: it should be a realistic alternative government.

And that is why this week’s Labour party conference is important to everyone, Labour supporter or otherwise.

Labour has seen a big increase in its membership.  Locally, we’ve seen an increase in Conservative membership too, since Theresa May became PM.   

Whichever party people feel closest to, I hope more and more people will join it.  Because the more people are involved, the stronger our democracy is.

Of course joining a party isn't the only way to be involved in politics. Single issue groups have a really important role to play and new media has enabled many more people to express and exchange views in new ways. That is a good thing and it will grow and grow.

But it is no substitute for broad membership of and involvement in parties, which are at the heart of our democracy.


This article first appeared in the Herald Group newspapers and Petersfield Post in September 2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gains...
Post a Comment
Read more

On post-truth and fake news

25 Jan 2017  'Post-truth’ is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016.  (Other recent winners of the annual accolade have included ‘vape’, ‘selfie’ and the ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji, apparently). Elsewhere we have heard ‘fake news’ decried, and a debate about whether you can have ‘facts’ and ‘alternative facts’ or if there can only ever be facts and falsehoods. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth is “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.  It is a concept that is said to have been building in salience around the world. It seems many had felt a long-standing mismatch between what the ‘elites’ in politics or business or the media had been saying was good for them, and what they felt themselves.  So the concept of the ‘objective fact’ had not been totally clear. There has always been partial news, and because of what psychologists call...
Post a Comment
Read more

To narrow the gap, the earlier you start the better

8 Oct 2013 In his Conference speech last week, Michael Gove set out clearly the moral purpose of policy: not only to raise standards for all, but just as important, to narrow the yawning achievement gap between rich and poor.  He described the Conservative mission to ensure “that every child has the opportunity to flourish”.  Though progress has already been made, in 2012 there was a 26 percentage points gap at GCSE (5+C+ including English & Maths) between kids on free school meals and their more affluent peers. But addressing this gap with teenagers is way too late.  The performance gap appears very early and widens through the school years.  In  Seven Key Truths about Social Mobility , the all-party social mobility group identified that the point of greatest leverage to equalise opportunity is the very earliest years. Of course kids from all backgrounds go on to do brilliant things.  But overall and on average, the correlations have a smooth predictab...
Post a Comment
Read more