Skip to main content

For career success, character matters as much as qualifications

11 Feb 2014

We all remember classmates who got few O-Levels or GCSEs, but went on to become surprisingly successful in their careers. Likewise, there are always those who do very well at school but for whom success fizzles out later.

So, what’s the difference? There is a wealth of research that suggests an individual’s character traits, as much as how bright they are or what exams they get, determine their path in life. The ‘recipe for success’ tends to include self-belief, the patience to pursue long-term goals, the ability to ‘bounce back’ from failures, recognition of the relationship between effort and (sometimes distant or uncertain) reward, and the persistence to keep going.

For many years, our educational focus as a country has been all but exclusively on exam results. Now, leading education jurisdictions such as Singapore are increasingly adding an emphasis on the ‘character development’ agenda.  As John Cridland CBE, Director-General of the CBI has warned, “there is a danger that schools become exam factories churning out people who are not sufficiently prepared for life outside the school gates”.

While character skills are not exactly the same thing as employability skills, there is notable overlap:


With more than 60 per cent of British employers sharing the opinion that school leavers do not have the self-management skills required for the workplace, it is essential that there is a focus on the character traits that are required for working life.

One way in which adolescents typically learnt how to cope with work was through a Saturday job. It was here that many of us first learned the reality that your boss will not always appreciate your brilliance, and whoever said “the customer is always right” clearly never worked in retail. From 2001-2004 the number of young 16-18-year-olds with a part-time job was around 475,000, but by 2011 the figure had dropped by more than 20 per cent to 370,000. So schools and extra-curricular activities are ever more important for developing the fortitude needed for the world of work.

Conservatives in government are clear on the importance of character development. As Michael Gove noted in his speech last week, “sports clubs, orchestras and choirs, school plays, cadets, debating competitions all help to build character and instil grit, to give children’s talents an opportunity to grow and to allow them to discover new talents they never knew they had.”

The Prime Minister has pledged to invest £150m a year in primary school sports funding until 2020 if the Conservatives are re-elected, recognising that “quality school sport has benefits that spread right across the curriculum and beyond – it develops confidence and a sense of achievement, it teaches young people how to rise to a challenge, and nurtures the character and skills that will help them get on and succeed in life”.

Today the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Social Mobility publishes a ‘Character & Resilience manifesto’. It outlines various policy proposals that aim to develop our young people into the rounded, confident, resilient individuals that they will need to be to compete in an increasingly global workplace, so that any child, regardless of background, can be a success story of tomorrow. As we sharpen our focus both on social mobility and attainment in the widest sense, we must care about character as much as GCSEs.


Damian Hinds is MP for East Hampshire and chairs the All-party Parliamentary Group on Social Mobility.


This article first appeared on Conservative Home in February 2014.

https://conservativehome.com/2014/02/11/damian-hinds-mp-character-matters-as-much-as-qualifications-when-it-comes-to-career-success/


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gains...
Post a Comment
Read more

On post-truth and fake news

25 Jan 2017  'Post-truth’ is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016.  (Other recent winners of the annual accolade have included ‘vape’, ‘selfie’ and the ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji, apparently). Elsewhere we have heard ‘fake news’ decried, and a debate about whether you can have ‘facts’ and ‘alternative facts’ or if there can only ever be facts and falsehoods. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth is “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.  It is a concept that is said to have been building in salience around the world. It seems many had felt a long-standing mismatch between what the ‘elites’ in politics or business or the media had been saying was good for them, and what they felt themselves.  So the concept of the ‘objective fact’ had not been totally clear. There has always been partial news, and because of what psychologists call...
Post a Comment
Read more

To narrow the gap, the earlier you start the better

8 Oct 2013 In his Conference speech last week, Michael Gove set out clearly the moral purpose of policy: not only to raise standards for all, but just as important, to narrow the yawning achievement gap between rich and poor.  He described the Conservative mission to ensure “that every child has the opportunity to flourish”.  Though progress has already been made, in 2012 there was a 26 percentage points gap at GCSE (5+C+ including English & Maths) between kids on free school meals and their more affluent peers. But addressing this gap with teenagers is way too late.  The performance gap appears very early and widens through the school years.  In  Seven Key Truths about Social Mobility , the all-party social mobility group identified that the point of greatest leverage to equalise opportunity is the very earliest years. Of course kids from all backgrounds go on to do brilliant things.  But overall and on average, the correlations have a smooth predictab...
Post a Comment
Read more