Skip to main content

The green industrial revolution


27 Nov 2020

Green industrial revolution” is a term that we have heard used a great deal in recent years.  The Ten Point Plan set out last week now puts that revolution in motion.

I know how many local groups and residents here in East Hampshire are passionate about the environment, and this plan marks the start of the UK’s path to net zero by 2050 and provides an important blueprint ahead of the COP26 climate summit that is due to be held in Glasgow next year.

It also comes as the UK prepares to co-host the Climate Ambition summit on the 12th December, marking the fifth anniversary of the Paris Agreement.

Covering clean energy, transport, nature and innovative technologies, it is big in scale and ambition, with an aim to create and support up to 250,000 highly-skilled green jobs.

It surprises many to hear that the UK is already further advanced compared to other countries on a number of aspects of green energy – an in particular offshore wind deployment.  Now there will be a target to produce enough offshore wind to power every home, quadrupling how much we produce to 40GW by 2030. 

Transport is also a key pillar of the plan, accelerating the transition to electric vehicles, and transforming our national infrastructure to better support their use.  News this week that the UK will end the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans by 2030, ten years earlier than originally planned, is not popular with everyone, I know, but is key to this shift.

The cost of electric cars needs to keep coming down, but equally important is infrastructure.  In areas like East Hampshire, with a lot of off-street parking, home charging is central.  But people also need confidence they will always be able to re-charge.  The £1.3 billion to support the rollout of chargepoints is therefore important.

But transport isn’t all about electric.  Hydrogen is at a much earlier stage of development, but could be the eventual answer, especially for goods vehicles.  As I’ve argued in Parliament, we need to invest in this technology too, and so I was pleased to see the plan to generate 5GW of production capacity by 2030.

Especially in the Covid lockdown, cycling and walking have come to the fore – and they are of course the most carbon-friendly transport modes of all.  The recent announcement of a further £175m being made available to Local Authorities in England for cycling and walking infrastructure will include more than £3m for Hampshire.  And the District Council has done a lot of work mapping out where future priorities will be.

An arena in which our local area will play a key part is trees.  Trees tick a lot of boxes – including the visual landscape, biodiversity, flood prevention – and also to reduce carbon.  There are ambitious plans locally - and nationally it is now envisaged we will plant 30,000 hectares of trees every year.

Elsewhere in the Ten Point Plan are items on nuclear energy, carbon capture and battery storage.  Batterie technology, in particular, I have always believed will be the big game changer – for transport, but also for generation: in theory, once the batteries are good enough, you could have close to all your electricity need provided by renewables.

This Ten Point Plan is indeed bold and gives a clear signal to industries across the British economy to invest here in the UK, and develop the skills, technology and infrastructure that will enable us to look forward to a greener future.   But it certainly won’t be the last word.  Just as the Industrial Revolution continued to develop, so too must we continue to evolve our green industrial revolution.


This article first appeared in the Herald Group newspapers and Petersfield Post in November 2020

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate change - a measured approach

27 Feb 2010 -  Letters to the Editor, Herald Newspapers Sir, In his letter in the Herald of 12 February, Simon Joslin of Oakhanger raises important points about the debate on global warming, points which cannot simply be ignored. There have been three key errors made by some (not all) of the leading proponents of action against global warming. The first error was to re-define ‘belief’ in global warming as some sort of article of faith, which should no longer be open to question. This is misguided; nothing in science should be immune to challenge. Calling those who do raise questions ‘flat-earthers’ is only likely to wind them up, and understandably so. The second error was to over-simplify the subject, to suggest that the world is just getting hotter, and that all studies confirm the same thing. In truth something as complex as world climate will always throw up anomalies, and trends will be more jumpy than straight-line. To pretend otherwise was asking for trouble. No wonder gainsayer
Post a Comment
Read more

Technical Education

6 Dec 2018 Speech at Battersea Power Station Good morning ladies and gentlemen… Thank you all for joining us here in Battersea… And thank you to Battersea for providing this very striking venue. I once came here as Minister for Employment and met some of your apprentices… I remember speaking to them about what they were doing…their future plans…and being struck - as I often am when talking to someone on a good quality apprenticeship - by their enthusiasm, their ambition, their optimism… the sense of what is possible in the future. Young people know when they are genuinely on a path to a good job, a great career – just as they know when they’re on a route to nowhere. And, unfortunately, for too long, we’ve had too many of our young people leaving school without the necessary skills or direction - and ending up on a dead-end route…getting in to work but not able to get on in work and progress to something better. I am determined now to change this. Everyone must be given the chance to ge
Post a Comment
Read more

For career success, character matters as much as qualifications

11 Feb 2014 We all remember classmates who got few O-Levels or GCSEs, but went on to become surprisingly successful in their careers. Likewise, there are always those who do very well at school but for whom success fizzles out later. So, what’s the difference? There is a wealth of research that suggests an individual’s character traits, as much as how bright they are or what exams they get, determine their path in life. The ‘recipe for success’ tends to include self-belief, the patience to pursue long-term goals, the ability to ‘bounce back’ from failures, recognition of the relationship between effort and (sometimes distant or uncertain) reward, and the persistence to keep going. For many years, our educational focus as a country has been all but exclusively on exam results. Now, leading education jurisdictions such as Singapore are increasingly adding an emphasis on the ‘character development’ agenda.  As John Cridland CBE, Director-General of the CBI has warned, “there is a danger t
Post a Comment
Read more